The Law Offices of Patrick L. Block, P.C.
503.491.4900 Call for a Free Case Evaluation
  • Home
  • About The Firm
  • Biographies
  • Medical Malpractice
  • Testimonials
  • FAQ
  • Recent Case Results
  • In The News
  • Contact Us
  • Call Today
  • Email Us
  • Our Map
  • Menu

One of Oregon’s

Top Law Firms

Our medical malpractice attorney was named among the Top 100
Trial Lawyers by the National Trial Lawyers.

Read Our FAQ Meet Our Attorney Free Consultation

Blog 2014 December Rules Eased for Winning Civil Cases in Oregon
Previous Post  |  Next Post

Rules Eased for Winning Civil Cases in Oregon

Posted By The Law Offices of Patrick L. Block, P.C. || 17-Dec-2014

Kennedy v. Wheeler should prove to be a landmark case in the state of Oregon. The December 11, 2014 ruling looks to change established laws regarding how to award economic and noneconomic damages for plaintiffs suing on grounds of personal injury, including medical malpractice suits.

Previously, the nine (at least) jurors who agreed to the amount of compensation for economic damages had to be the very same nine who agreed to non-economic compensation. In the event that a different set of nine or more jurors agreed, the judge would ask the jurors to deliberate further and if no agreement on both amounts of compensation could be reached, the jury would be declared "hung."

Breaking Established Law for More Effective Rulings

This recent ruling came out of a 2007 car accident after Kelsey Wheeler struck Amber Kennedy, resulting in "extensive and lasting pain" for the plaintiff's tailbone. The trial wrapped up in spring of 2011 with jurors voting unanimously that Wheeler was at fault and ten of the jurors concurring on the amount of economic damages. However, a different nine agreed to an amount of non-economic damages for Kennedy's pain and suffering.

Yamhill County Circuit Court Judge Carroll Tichenor broke with tradition and agreed to the jury's findings. The Oregon Court of Appeals reversed the trial judge in August 2013 and on December 11, 2014 the Oregon Supreme Court reinstated the original verdict.

This move on the part of the Oregon Supreme Court can only serve to benefit future plaintiffs suing for any kind of injuries caused by car accidents, other accidents, and medical malpractice. In the future, only nine out of twelve jurors will be needed to agree on questions regarding economic and non-economic damages without the requirement that they be the same nine jurors. In all likelihood, this will result in a higher success rate for plaintiffs suing for damages in court.

If you suffered harm as a result of negligence on behalf of a doctor or hospital staff, get in touch with The Law Offices of Patrick L. Block, P.C. to learn about your legal options to pursue fair compensation.

Categories: Medical Malpractice, News
Share Post